Educator testimonial:
"When you work
with WIN, you have 'real teachers'
talking to real teachers."
Highlights
of SCIRA Conference
Myrtle Beach, SC
February 16-18, 2006
By Amy
Mikell
Barbara King Shaver conducted a daylong pre-conference seminar
on “Differentiated Literacy Instruction.” Her first point was
that a teacher must know students well to truly differentiate
and meet each student’s needs. Teachers can “differentiate
process, product, content, and environment based on students’
readiness, interests, and learning styles.”
To get to know students she recommends using surveys, interest
inventories, and pre-reading activities (such as key vocabulary
words: which ones do they know?) and emphasizes the importance
of building community early using icebreakers and lots of active
involvement in cooperative learning activities. She also
advises teachers to become “assessment junkies” taking time
often to check on student progress.
Another key element of her presentation was a look at how
understanding the theory of multiple intelligences helps to
differentiate instruction. Teachers may administer surveys to
help students determine their strongest areas: linguistic,
logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, body-kinesthetic,
intra-, and inter-personal. Instructional units may then be
designed to provide opportunities for students to participate in
various ways, such as presenting skits, writing reports,
creating maps, etc.
For more information, you may want to obtain her book
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN THE ENGLISH CLASSROOM (Barbara
King-Shaver and Alyce Hunter) available through
www.heinemann.com.
In Friday’s keynote, Dr. Kylene Beers railed against the
National Reading Panel’s report for which she said they used
only 14 studies and used only data that supported their desired
outcome. A notorious example is the report’s disdain for the
value of allotting school time for independent reading. She
also cautioned against relying too heavily on science as it
often neglects the art of teaching; brain research only reveals
physiological activities and doesn’t also consider the emotional
and social factors that impact learning.
Dr. Beers explained that recent brain research findings should
inform reading instruction in two ways. First, we must teach
word recognition well but then move on to focus on
comprehension. Much more time should be devoted to wide reading
opportunities, as most vocabulary is acquired through reading.
The goal is “automaticity” which means that readers have a large
word bank that allows most of their brains’ energy to focus on
meaning rather than decoding. When automaticity is interrupted,
poor comprehension results.
She distinguishes between automaticity and fluency. Fluency is
a three-part skill: accuracy, automaticity, and prosody (the
ability to read with expressiveness needed to make sense.) For
example, “The old man the boat” and “Woman without her man is
nothing” must be read with correct expression to make sense. To
help students develop prosody, teachers must read aloud every
day using a variety of genre to help students develop what
Eudora Welty calls “a reader’s ear.”
She emphasized that classrooms must be literacy rich so students
are exposed to many words. They need to simply recognize words
more than work on them; drills, worksheets, structural analysis
all are useful but must not be the whole focus of reading
instruction.
A second finding says that prediction must be used to improve
comprehension. She referred to much more than simple “What will
happen next…?” items. Rather, students must have frequent
opportunities to transfer skills and learning to new
situations. To dramatize this concept, audience members had
been given stapled sheets of yellow, pink, or blue and told to
open them only when instructed. When we opened our sheets, we
were given five minutes to follow the instructions and then were
given a “test” to see which group was most successful in
remembering the listed words. Overwhelmingly, the group who had
been instructed to “Rate these words by their level of
pleasantness” remembered more words than those told to “Memorize
the list” or to “Count the vowels in each word.” The “rating”
activity required synthesis (applying old knowledge to new
situation) and was more effective than the memorization, which
rarely affects long-term memory, and the meaningless counting
vowels task (such busy work hinders comprehension and should be
avoided.) Wide, frequent reading aids prediction; for example,
students who see poetry often begin to know how poems “act.”
Dr. Beers exhorted us to remember that teachers are the
architects of the learning landscape. We cannot give up that
role to scientists and politicians. She noted the “digital
divide” where children of poverty are often limited to
instruction in the basics. They must be given opportunities to
exercise their higher order thinking skills. Schools are NOT
assembly plants! Rather, classrooms should be like productive
“3-ring circuses” with lots of different activities going on.
Schools must nurture individuals, not attempt to produce uniform
results (as NCLB seems to mandate.) Rather, public schools
must be like the Statue of Liberty, welcoming all comers and
helping them to become life-long learners.
Dr. Terrell Young (Washington State University) presented
“Getting the Most from your Classroom Library.” Research shows
that environment has a huge impact on student behavior, thus
your library should reflect your feelings about reading. The
most effective classroom libraries provide at least 8 books per
student, contain all genre to reach all readers, are categorized
for easy use, offer easy circulation rules, are physically
accessible and visually attractive, and regularly provide new
books.
He cautioned us not to level books by difficulty as that denies
students the chance to select for themselves. He also advised
making your read-alouds accessible due to high interest and
previous knowledge of those texts. We should give students
frequent chances to talk about their books as that raises
comprehension.
Cute display ideas include linked books (same topic, different
genre), award-winners, “our favorites,” banned books, and
“author of the month.”
Dr. Young stated that just having a classroom library is not
enough. Teacher behaviors also matter. They should model
reading, do book talks, read aloud, and determine their
students’ interests. Research shows that if a teacher “pushes”
fiction and non-fiction equally, kids will read both equally.
Also, 80%
of adult reading is non-fiction while 80% of school reading is
fiction, leaving an unhealthy gap.
New this year was a session specifically for education students
and interns. Veteran educators plus a second-year teacher
fielded questions from the group. When asked what professional
development had meant the most to them, one responded the
Writing Project while another advised watching other teachers in
action. Responses to a query about what resources are most
crucial for first year teachers ranged from books of all genre
to visually pleasing displays to make their classroom inviting
and stimulating. Another question dealt with how to address
cheating and lying among students. The best approach was said
to be working to build mutual respect from the first day and to
use lots of community-building activities.
A question was asked about what type of teacher the panelists
would prefer for their own children. Responses included one who
listens, is well-informed about instructional standards and
practices, who understands that every child is smart in his own
way, who respects kids and has high expectations, who offers
lots of variety to make learning exciting, and who communicates
frequently with the parents. Finally, panelists were asked for
one tip to help new teachers deal with the pressures of their
profession. Advice included “Never give up!” “Be organized and
have fun.” “Remember that each student is someone’s child and
should be treated like you would want your own child treated.”
“Get to know your kids.” “Create a classroom family.” Finally,
“Create a school family” (colleagues are crucial.)
Author Carmen Deedy delivered the morning keynote on Saturday,
telling the story of how she, a Cuban refugee who was dyslexic,
found a love of reading at age seven thanks to the “Library
Goddess” (the librarian) at the public library in Decatur,
Georgia. In her unique fashion, Deedy took all of us back in
memory to our own first library visits and the excitement of
finding that first wonderful book, in her case, CHARLOTTE’S
WEB. She drove home the point that the world is full of code,
such as library procedures, that must be taught. She told of
her father, who had learned to read only at age 14 and told his
daughter what it had been like.
He said
that looking around at all the street signs and store displays
was painful since, “Those words did not belong to me.”
She ended by reminding us as teachers of our responsibility to
help our students learn the world’s codes. She said that her
parents had given her the greatest gift, her life, but that the
librarian had given her the second, the love of reading.
Shannon Cannon (University of California) provided a session,
“High-Impact Vocabulary Strategies Using Informational Text.”
She began by reading aloud the picture book MISS ALANEIOUS by
Debra Frasier, in which the main character thinks in dictionary
definitions. She then urged teachers to use the business
concept of “ROI” (Return on Investment”) by using strategies
that yield the best results.
Research says that by high school graduation, students need
50,000 words to be successful. Sadly, most students of poverty
acquire only 20,000. This vocabulary gap can be a crucial
factor in school failure. Cannon offered several principals of
in-depth word instruction: integration (connect new words with
familiar ideas), repetition, meaningful use, and active
engagement. She cautioned that most vocabulary is learned
indirectly, but some must be taught directly and that
word-learning strategies will help reading comprehension.
Some helpful hints are that pre-teaching vocabulary will help
students comprehend text, but that the words selected must not
be basic words that students already know, or “domain” words
that are so obscure they’ll never see them again; rather they
should be “mature” words that have usefulness beyond that text.
(For more information about “tiers” of words, see research by
Beck, McKeown, and Kucan ’02.) She warned that the dictionary
doesn’t always help students understand the words. Teachers
must also provide explanations that use everyday language. She
then provided three activities to use after initially
introducing new words. These activities provide active
engagement with new words to reinforce the learning. One is
word associations where you list the new words and ask questions
such as “Which word goes with…?” (ex: “accomplice” with
“crook”). Another is asking “Have you ever?” to let students
write about a time they might have done that action (ex:
“Describe a time you might commend someone.” Her final
suggestion provides an answer to the problem of asking students
to use the word in a sentence of their own and the sentence
misuses the word. Instead, provide a list of “Idea Completions”
such as “When might you…?” or “The skiing instructor said Maria
was a novice on the slopes because…”
She advised that the best words to teach are new words for an
unknown concept; use less instructional time for new words for
known concepts, as those can be “taught on the fly.” Two books
she recommends are WORDS YOU SHOULD KNOW (David Olsen) and
BRINGING WORDS TO LIFE (Isabel Beck.)
She ended her session with a humorous reading from Jeff
Foxworthy’s REDNECK DICTIONARY and by showing slides of
newspaper cartoons using wacky definitions (B.C. often does
this.)
In summary, this year’s conference provided a great mix of
inspiration, research findings, and practical suggestions
dealing with huge issues: vocabulary; classroom libraries/wide,
frequent reading; and differentiated instruction. I hope these
notes will encourage readers to attend professional conferences
and seminars often, as they certainly have huge “ROI” for your
practice.
|